Simon & Schuster. Twenty-one years old, and the method that runs this company today.
Lockheed’s customer-satisfaction reviews on the Simon & Schuster account were failing, and nobody inside the operation could say exactly why. Simon & Schuster — Viacom’s publishing arm — was not a client you guess with.
The first move wasn’t a system. It was a question: I went to Simon & Schuster’s director-level leadership and asked their pain points. The answer pointed at service delivery. The paper told the rest: the contract promised capabilities the service-level agreements and incident matrices were never built to deliver. Ask the operation where it hurts, then read the systems and the paper against each other — that diagnosis, first run at twenty-one, is the same first move every Converge engagement opens with today.
The operation was rebuilt to deliver what the contract promised: incident coding tightened until a ticket meant one thing — single user down or degraded, multi-user down or degraded, what became SEV-1 and SEV-2 — notification protocols trained into the call-center floor, response thresholds set and then met.
The contract penalties — running thousands of dollars a month — stopped. The customer started flying me to them: Philadelphia, to work with the senior logistics engineers behind their book distribution; Rockefeller Center, to work with executive leadership on operations and policy. They offered a role in New York. I was twenty-one. Found where the contract promised more than it delivered, built the operations that delivered it. They wrote company policy around it. Achieved.
First-hand: our figures, from our watch. We were in the room — examine any of them on the call.
← The record, account by account